You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Second or third additional chemotherapy drug for non‐small cell lung cancer in patients with advanced disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004569.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine Delbaldo, Stefan Michiels, Estelle Rolland, Nathalie Syz, Jean‐Charles Soria, Thierry Le Chevalier, Jean Pierre Pignon |
Abstract |
Randomized trials have demonstrated that adding a drug to a single-agent or to a two-agent regimen increased the tumor response rate in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although its impact on survival remains controversial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Psychology | 2 | 8% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2012.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,216
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,037
of 174,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.