You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vitamin B for treating peripheral neuropathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004573.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cynthia D Ang, Maria Jenelyn M Alviar, Antonio L Dans, Gwyneth Giselle P Bautista‐Velez, Maria Vanessa C Villaruz‐Sulit, Jennifer J Tan, Homer U Co, Maria Rhida M Bautista, Artemio A Roxas |
| Abstract |
Vitamin B is frequently used for treating peripheral neuropathy but its efficacy is not clear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 25% |
| Japan | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Philippines | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,525,068
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,238
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,629
of 96,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.