You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Local anaesthetic sympathetic blockade for complex regional pain syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004598.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stanton TR, Wand BM, Carr DB, Birklein F, Wasner GL, O'Connell NE, O'Connell, Neil E, Wand, Benedict M, Gibson, William, Carr, Daniel B, Birklein, Frank, Stanton, Tasha R, Tasha R Stanton, Benedict M Wand, Daniel B Carr, Frank Birklein, Gunnar L Wasner, Neil E O'Connell, Wasner, Gunnar L |
| Abstract |
This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library, 2005, Issue 4, on local anaesthetic blockade (LASB) of the sympathetic chain used to treat complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Virgin Islands, U.S. | 1 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,931,061
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,378
of 12,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,374
of 202,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.