You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004619.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Pynnonen, Jennifer V Brinkmeier, Marc C Thorne, Lee Yee Chong, Martin J Burton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Spain | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 18% |
| Unknown | 111 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 125 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,119,316
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,445
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,572
of 329,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.