You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Full-mouth disinfection for the treatment of adult chronic periodontitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004622.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eberhard J, Jepsen S, Jervøe-Storm PM, Needleman I, Worthington HV |
Abstract |
In an attempt to enhance treatment outcomes, alternative protocols for anti-infective periodontal therapy have been introduced. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 24% |
Chile | 3 | 10% |
United States | 3 | 10% |
Spain | 3 | 10% |
Mexico | 2 | 7% |
Latvia | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 34% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 150 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 18% |
Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
Researcher | 12 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
Other | 38 | 24% |
Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 71% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
Psychology | 2 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 27 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#1,405,699
of 23,569,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,208
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,799
of 158,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,569,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.