You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004680.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giovanni FM Strippoli, Allison Tong, David W Johnson, Francesco Paolo Schena, Jonathan C Craig |
Abstract |
As many as 15-50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Singapore | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
Researcher | 12 | 16% |
Professor | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 56% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,741,269
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,918
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,306
of 75,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.