You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions to increase the use of electronic health information by healthcare practitioners to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004749.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle Fiander, Jessie McGowan, Roland Grad, Pierre Pluye, Karin Hannes, Michel Labrecque, Nia W Roberts, Douglas M Salzwedel, Vivian Welch, Peter Tugwell |
| Abstract |
There is a large volume of health information available, and, if applied in clinical practice, may contribute to effective patient care. Despite an abundance of information, sub-optimal care is common. Many factors influence practitioners' use of health information, and format (electronic or other) may be one such factor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 319 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 17% |
| Researcher | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Librarian | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 20% |
| Unknown | 79 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 17% |
| Psychology | 21 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 13% |
| Unknown | 87 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,135,998
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,318
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,312
of 277,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.