↓ Skip to main content

Multisystemic Therapy for social, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth aged 10‐17

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multisystemic Therapy for social, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth aged 10‐17
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004797.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia H Littell, Margo Campbell, Stacy Green, Barbara Toews

Abstract

Multisystemic Therapy (MST) is an intensive, home-based intervention for families of youth with social, emotional, and behavioral problems. Masters-level therapists engage family members in identifying and changing individual, family, and environmental factors thought to contribute to problem behavior. Intervention may include efforts to improve communication, parenting skills, peer relations, school performance, and social networks. Most MST trials were conducted by program developers in the USA; results of one independent trial are available and others are in progress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 263 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 63 23%
Unknown 59 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 22%
Social Sciences 46 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Unspecified 12 4%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 69 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,323,161
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,770
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,998
of 72,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.