You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pain relief for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004829.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene Kwan, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Fiona Knox, Alex McNeil |
| Abstract |
Various methods of conscious sedation and analgesia have been used for pain relief during oocyte recovery in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures. The choice of agent has also been influenced by the quality of sedation and analgesia as well as by concerns about possible detrimental effects on reproductive outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Sweden | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,461,735
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,544
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,367
of 293,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.