↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004834.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Urbà González, Mariona Pinart, Mónica Rengifo‐Pardo, Antonio Macaya, Jorge Alvar, John A Tweed

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 308 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 18%
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Bachelor 39 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 44 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 7%
Psychology 11 3%
Other 60 19%
Unknown 54 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,471,255
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,375
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,047
of 107,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.