↓ Skip to main content

Tai chi for treating rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tai chi for treating rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004849
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice Han, Maria Judd, Vivian Welch, Taixiang Wu, Peter Tugwell, George A Wells

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory autoimmune disease that results in the destruction of the musculoskeletal system. The major goals of treatment are to relieve pain, reduce inflammation, slow down or stop joint damage, prevent disability, and preserve or improve the person's sense of well-being and ability to function. Tai Chi, interchangeably known as Tai Chi Chuan, is an ancient Chinese health-promoting martial art form that has been recognized in China as an effective arthritis therapy for centuries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 18%
Psychology 8 5%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,186,341
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,467
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,217
of 59,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.