↓ Skip to main content

Behavioural and cognitive behavioural therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Behavioural and cognitive behavioural therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004856.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard T O'Kearney, Kaarin Anstey, Chwee von Sanden, Aliza Hunt

Abstract

While behavioural or cognitive-behavioural therapy (BT/CBT) is recommended as the psychotherapeutic treatment of choice for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), the application of BT/CBT to paediatric OCD may not be straightforward.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 281 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 15%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Other 61 21%
Unknown 72 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 87 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 81 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,047,238
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,319
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,920
of 84,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.