You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prophylactic antibiotics for manual removal of retained placenta in vaginal birth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004904.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chompilas Chongsomchai, Pisake Lumbiganon, Malinee Laopaiboon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 25% |
| Unknown | 47 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 35% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,869,977
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,530
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,886
of 273,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.