You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non‐hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004923.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel Rada, Daniel Capurro, Tomas Pantoja, Javiera Corbalán, Gladys Moreno, Luz M Letelier, Claudio Vera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 48% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 24% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 71 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,706,881
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,676
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,811
of 105,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.