You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004945.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A Metin Gülmezoglu, Caroline A Crowther, Philippa Middleton, Emer Heatley |
| Abstract |
As a pregnancy continues beyond term the risks of babies dying inside the womb or in the immediate newborn period increase. Whether a policy of labour induction at a predetermined gestational age can reduce this increased risk is the subject of this review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 323 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 17% |
| Researcher | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 65 | 19% |
| Unknown | 79 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 87 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,781,531
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,799
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,272
of 181,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.