You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve respiratory outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004953.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Bruschettini, Colm Pf O'Donnell, Peter G Davis, Colin J Morley, Lorenzo Moja, Maria Grazia Calevo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 93 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 104 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,995,911
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,711
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,228
of 391,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.