↓ Skip to main content

Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004993.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lethaby A, Ivanova V, Johnson NP, Lethaby, Anne, Ivanova, Valeria, Johnson, Neil, Lethaby, A, Ivanova, V, Johnson, N P

Abstract

Hysterectomy using an abdominal approach removes either the uterus alone (subtotal hysterectomy) or both the uterus and the cervix (total hysterectomy). The latter is more common but outcomes have not been systematically compared. To assess and compare outcomes with subtotal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's specialised register of controlled trials (December 2005), Central (December 2005), Medline (1966 to December 2005), EmBase (1980 to December 2005), Biological Abstracts (1980 to December 2005), the National Research Register and relevant citation lists. Only randomised controlled trials of women undergoing either total or subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions were included. Three trials that included 733 participants were included. Independent selection of trials and data extraction were undertaken by 2 reviewers and results compared. There was no evidence of a difference in the rates of incontinence, constipation or measures of sexual function. In one unblinded trial, a significantly greater proportion of women indicated that they had frequent episodes of urinary incontinence after subtotal hysterectomy when compared with total hysterectomy (OR=2.1, 1.02 to 4.3), but these results were not confirmed by the other two trials that measured both stress and urge incontinence and urinary frequency. . Length of surgery and amount of blood lost during surgery were significantly reduced during subtotal hysterectomy when compared with total hysterectomy, but there was no evidence of a difference in the odds of transfusion. Febrile morbidity was less likely (OR=0.43, 0.25 to 0.75) and ongoing cyclical vaginal bleeding one year after surgery was more likely (OR=11.3, 4.1 to 31.2) after subtotal when compared with total hysterectomy. There was no evidence of a difference in the rates of other complications, recovery from surgery or readmission rates. This review has not confirmed the perception that subtotal hysterectomy offers improved outcomes for sexual, urinary or bowel function when compared with total abdominal hysterectomy. Surgery is shorter and intraoperative blood loss and fever are reduced but women are more likely to experience ongoing cyclical bleeding up to a year after surgery with subtotal hysterectomy compared to total hysterectomy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%