You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005014.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denise Kendrick, Ben Young, Amanda J Mason‐Jones, Nohaid Ilyas, Felix A Achana, Nicola J Cooper, Stephanie J Hubbard, Alex J Sutton, Sherie Smith, Persephone Wynn, Caroline A Mulvaney, Michael C Watson, Carol Coupland |
| Abstract |
In industrialised countries injuries (including burns, poisoning or drowning) are the leading cause of childhood death and steep social gradients exist in child injury mortality and morbidity. The majority of injuries in pre-school children occur at home but there is little meta-analytic evidence that child home safety interventions reduce injury rates or improve a range of safety practices, and little evidence on their effect by social group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 19% |
| Researcher | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 9% |
| Psychology | 14 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 70 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,344,221
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,845
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,961
of 187,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.