You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005048.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yingxue Dai, Chaoying Li, Yao Xie, Xudong Liu, Jianxin Zhang, Jing Zhou, Xiongfei Pan, Shujuan Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 308 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 101 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 9% |
| Psychology | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 117 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,700,145
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,024
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,188
of 276,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.