↓ Skip to main content

Bisphosphonate therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bisphosphonate therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005088.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerry Dwan, Carrie A Phillipi, Robert D Steiner, Donald Basel, Dwan K, Phillipi CA, Steiner RD, Basel D

Abstract

Osteogenesis imperfecta is caused by a genetic defect resulting in an abnormal type I collagen bone matrix which typically results in multiple fractures with little or no trauma. Bisphosphonates are used in an attempt to increase bone mineral density and reduce these fractures in people with osteogenesis imperfecta.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,354,328
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,959
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,148
of 228,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.