↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005188.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger E Thomas, Diane L Lorenzetti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 275 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 18%
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Other 18 6%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 67 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 15%
Psychology 20 7%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 79 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,771,201
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,796
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,123
of 240,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.