↓ Skip to main content

Bicycle helmet legislation for the uptake of helmet use and prevention of head injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
30 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bicycle helmet legislation for the uptake of helmet use and prevention of head injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005401.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Macpherson, Anneliese Spinks

Abstract

Evidence exists to suggest that bicycle helmets may reduce the risk of head injuries to cyclists, however helmets are not uniformly worn by all bicycle users. Legislation has been enacted in some countries to mandate helmet use by cyclists, however the issue remains controversial with opponents arguing that this may inhibit people from bicycle riding and thus from gaining the associated health benefits, or that other countermeasures may have been responsible for decline in head injuries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 239 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 14 5%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 58 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 33%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Engineering 13 5%
Psychology 13 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 75 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#878,028
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,700
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,759
of 96,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.