↓ Skip to main content

Combined DTP‐HBV‐HIB vaccine versus separately administered DTP‐HBV and HIB vaccines for primary prevention of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae B (HIB)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined DTP‐HBV‐HIB vaccine versus separately administered DTP‐HBV and HIB vaccines for primary prevention of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> B (HIB)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005530.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edna S Bar‐On, Elad Goldberg, Sarah Hellmann, Leonard Leibovici

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 51 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Psychology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 59 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,302,194
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,795
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,434
of 174,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.