↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
480 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005595.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin, Chung-Wei Christine, Donkers, Nicole AJ, Refshauge, Kathryn M, Beckenkamp, Paula R, Khera, Kriti, Moseley, Anne M, Donkers, Nicole A J

Abstract

Rehabilitation after ankle fracture can begin soon after the fracture has been treated, either surgically or non-surgically, by the use of different types of immobilisation that allow early commencement of weight-bearing or exercise. Alternatively, rehabilitation, including the use of physical or manual therapies, may start following the period of immobilisation. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2008.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 472 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 81 17%
Student > Master 58 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 8%
Other 33 7%
Other 95 20%
Unknown 130 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 170 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 76 16%
Sports and Recreations 19 4%
Psychology 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 39 8%
Unknown 151 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,572,479
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,626
of 12,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,210
of 180,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.