You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005654.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chantale Dumoulin, E. Jean C Hay‐Smith, Gabrielle Mac Habée‐Séguin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 13 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 84% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 389 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 17% |
| Researcher | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 10% |
| Other | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 79 | 20% |
| Unknown | 66 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 149 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 88 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Psychology | 15 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 9% |
| Unknown | 79 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#556,765
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#989
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,862
of 242,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.