You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005654.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chantale Dumoulin, Licia P Cacciari, E Jean C Hay‐Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 200 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 32 | 16% |
| Spain | 15 | 8% |
| Chile | 13 | 7% |
| United States | 12 | 6% |
| Ireland | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Italy | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 77 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 156 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 14% |
| Scientists | 13 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 872 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 872 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 118 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 99 | 11% |
| Other | 56 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 6% |
| Researcher | 45 | 5% |
| Other | 125 | 14% |
| Unknown | 377 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 169 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 165 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 3% |
| Psychology | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 75 | 9% |
| Unknown | 395 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 317. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#108,706
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#205
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,126
of 356,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.