You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heparin‐bonded catheters for prolonging the patency of central venous catheters in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005983.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prakeshkumar S Shah, Niketa Shah |
| Abstract |
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are a mainstay in the management of critically ill children. However, these catheters are associated with mechanical and infectious complications which reduce their life span. Heparin bonding of catheters has shown promise in animal studies and in adults. This is the first update of a review published in 2007. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 186 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 28% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 57 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,198,869
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,928
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,669
of 235,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.