You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006036.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fary Khan, Lynne Turner‐Stokes, Louisa Ng, Trevor Kilpatrick, Bhasker Amatya |
| Abstract |
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MD) is an important component of symptomatic and supportive treatment for Multiple sclerosis (MS), but evidence base for its effectiveness is yet to be established. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 466 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 13% |
| Researcher | 52 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 80 | 17% |
| Unknown | 125 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 15% |
| Psychology | 34 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 13% |
| Unknown | 145 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,261,352
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,577
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,187
of 88,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.