You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pressure support versus T‐tube for weaning from mechanical ventilation in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006056.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdaline T Ladeira, Flávia M Ribeiro Vital, Regis B Andriolo, Brenda NG Andriolo, Álvaro N Atallah, Maria S Peccin |
| Abstract |
Mechanical ventilation is important in caring for patients with critical illness. Clinical complications, increased mortality, and high costs of health care are associated with prolonged ventilatory support or premature discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Weaning refers to the process of gradually or abruptly withdrawing mechanical ventilation. The weaning process begins after partial or complete resolution of the underlying pathophysiology precipitating respiratory failure and ends with weaning success (successful extubation in intubated patients or permanent withdrawal of ventilatory support in tracheostomized patients). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 369 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 10% |
| Researcher | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 85 | 23% |
| Unknown | 119 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 133 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,613,652
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,446
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,616
of 241,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.