↓ Skip to main content

Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in this source, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006067.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verheijen, Evelyn C, Raven, Joanna H, Hofmeyr, G Justus

Abstract

Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour involves application of manual pressure to the uppermost part of the uterus directed towards the birth canal in an attempt to assist spontaneous vaginal delivery and avoid prolonged second stage or the need for operative delivery. Fundal pressure has also been applied using an inflatable girdle. A survey in the United States found that 84% of the respondents used fundal pressure in their obstetric centres.There is little evidence to demonstrate that the use of fundal pressure is effective to improve maternal and/or neonatal outcomes. Several anecdotal reports suggest that fundal pressure is associated with maternal and neonatal complications: for example, uterine rupture, neonatal fractures and brain damage. There is a need for objective evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of fundal pressure in the second stage of labour.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 22%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 12 12%