You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006124.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Colin H Wilson, Aliu Sanni, David A Rix, Naeem A Soomro |
Abstract |
Waiting lists for kidney transplantation continue to grow and live organ donation has become more important as the number of brain stem dead cadaveric organ donors continues to fall. The major disincentive to potential kidney donors is the pain and morbidity associated with open surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 211 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 15% |
Researcher | 23 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
Other | 47 | 22% |
Unknown | 50 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 10% |
Unknown | 58 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,102,546
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,331
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,664
of 155,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.