↓ Skip to main content

Colchicine for acute gout

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
26 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colchicine for acute gout
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006190.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene van Echteld, Mihir D Wechalekar, Naomi Schlesinger, Rachelle Buchbinder, Daniel Aletaha

Abstract

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2006. Gout is one of the most common rheumatic diseases worldwide. Despite the use of colchicine as one of the first-line therapies for the treatment of acute gout, evidence for its benefits and harms is relatively limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 19%
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2021.
All research outputs
#828,600
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,577
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,847
of 243,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.