You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006213.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed AL‐Khamis, Iain McCallum, Peter M King, Julie Bruce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 54% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,054,608
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,350
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,411
of 173,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.