↓ Skip to main content

Cognition‐based interventions for healthy older people and people with mild cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
303 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
412 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognition‐based interventions for healthy older people and people with mild cognitive impairment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006220.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mike Martin, Linda Clare, Anne Mareike Altgassen, Michelle H Cameron, Franzisca Zehnder

Abstract

Evidence from some, but not all non-randomised studies suggest the possibility that cognitive training may influence cognitive functioning in older people. Due to the differences among cognitive training interventions reported in the literature, giving a general overview of the current literature remains difficult.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 398 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 15%
Researcher 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 80 19%
Unknown 93 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 110 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 6%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Neuroscience 21 5%
Other 55 13%
Unknown 112 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,279,166
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,696
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,402
of 193,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.