You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mother and baby units for schizophrenia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006333 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claire B Irving, Mete Saylan |
Abstract |
Mother and baby units (MBUs) are recommended, in the UK, as an optimal site for treating post partum psychoses. Naturalistic studies suggest poor outcomes for mothers and their children if admission is needed during the first year after birth, but the evidence for the effectiveness of MBUs in addressing the problems faced by both mothers with mental illness and their babies is unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 237 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
Researcher | 26 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 16% |
Unknown | 73 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 55 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 7% |
Unknown | 76 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,503,514
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,541
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,883
of 175,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.