You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006413.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xavier Bosch‐Capblanch, Sajil Liaqat, Paul Garner |
| Abstract |
Primary healthcare (PHC) workers often work alone or in isolation. Healthcare managerial supervision is recommended to help assure quality; but this requires skilled supervisors and takes time and resources. It is therefore important to assess to what extent supervision is beneficial and the ways in which it can be implemented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 339 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 20% |
| Researcher | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 20% |
| Unknown | 70 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 46 | 13% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 13% |
| Unknown | 82 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,994,598
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,885
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,253
of 136,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.