You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chinese herbal medicine for premenstrual syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006414.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zheng Jing, Xunzhe Yang, Khaled MK Ismail, Xiao Y Chen, Taixiang Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 56 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,438,955
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,218
of 13,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,519
of 185,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.