You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006432.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Coupar, Alex Pollock, Frederike van Wijck, Jacqui Morris, Peter Langhorne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 313 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 61 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 7% |
| Engineering | 18 | 6% |
| Psychology | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 17% |
| Unknown | 86 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,106,495
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,863
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,753
of 103,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.