You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006460.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tianjing Li, Kate Shotton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |