You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Topical silver for preventing wound infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006478.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marja N Storm‐Versloot, Cornelis G Vos, Dirk T Ubbink, Hester Vermeulen |
| Abstract |
Silver-containing treatments are popular and used in wound treatments to combat a broad spectrum of pathogens, but evidence of their effectiveness in preventing wound infection or promoting healing is lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 252 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 19% |
| Unknown | 66 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,174,188
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,428
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,896
of 110,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.