You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006560.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Smith, Susan M, Soubhi, Hassan, Fortin, Martin, Hudon, Catherine, O'Dowd, Tom, Susan M Smith, Hassan Soubhi, Martin Fortin, Catherine Hudon, Tom O'Dowd |
Abstract |
Many people with chronic disease have more than one chronic condition, which is referred to as multimorbidity. While this is not a new phenomenon, there is greater recognition of its impact and the importance of improving outcomes for individuals affected. Research in the area to date has focused mainly on descriptive epidemiology and impact assessment. There has been limited exploration of the effectiveness of interventions for multimorbidity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 12 | 63% |
France | 2 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
Scientists | 4 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
United States | 5 | 1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 1% |
Unknown | 330 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 81 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 14% |
Student > Master | 36 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 7% |
Other | 90 | 25% |
Unknown | 51 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 11% |
Psychology | 29 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Other | 39 | 11% |
Unknown | 63 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,447,683
of 24,618,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,210
of 12,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,834
of 165,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.