↓ Skip to main content

Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006590.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin Wm Vernooij, Michelle Lancee, Anne Cleves, Philipp Dahm, Chris H Bangma, Katja Kh Aben

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Other 23 8%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 123 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Unspecified 5 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 137 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,123,095
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,311
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,523
of 433,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.