You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long‐term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006605.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Meredith Noble, Jonathan R Treadwell, Stephen J Tregear, Vivian H Coates, Philip J Wiffen, Clarisse Akafomo, Karen M Schoelles, Roger Chou |
Abstract |
Opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is controversial due to concerns regarding long-term effectiveness and safety, particularly the risk of tolerance, dependence, or abuse. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 547 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 280 | 51% |
United Kingdom | 14 | 3% |
Canada | 8 | 1% |
Australia | 4 | <1% |
Comoros | 3 | <1% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 3 | <1% |
Iceland | 1 | <1% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 2% |
Unknown | 223 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 489 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 6% |
Scientists | 16 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 1% |
Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
United States | 7 | 1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 583 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 74 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 12% |
Student > Master | 71 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 54 | 9% |
Other | 48 | 8% |
Other | 149 | 25% |
Unknown | 135 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 241 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 7% |
Psychology | 35 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 24 | 4% |
Other | 80 | 13% |
Unknown | 158 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 783. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#25,024
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43
of 174,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.