You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006632.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Rotter, Leigh Kinsman, Erica L James, Andreas Machotta, Holger Gothe, Jon Willis, Pamela Snow, Joachim Kugler |
Abstract |
Clinical pathways are structured multidisciplinary care plans used by health services to detail essential steps in the care of patients with a specific clinical problem. They aim to link evidence to practice and optimise clinical outcomes whilst maximising clinical efficiency. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
Canada | 1 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 14% |
Belgium | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 698 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | <1% |
Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | <1% |
Unknown | 676 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 115 | 16% |
Researcher | 84 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 66 | 9% |
Other | 50 | 7% |
Other | 139 | 20% |
Unknown | 176 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 236 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 90 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 24 | 3% |
Computer Science | 21 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 3% |
Other | 104 | 15% |
Unknown | 203 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,490,180
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,173
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,290
of 112,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.