↓ Skip to main content

Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
21 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006640.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathy Bennett, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Ebbe Langholz, Lise Lotte Gluud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 226 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 50 22%
Unknown 71 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Psychology 5 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 78 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#936,215
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,833
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,699
of 369,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.