You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006655.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Khadra Galaal, Andrew Bryant, Ann D Fisher, Maha Al‐Khaduri, Fiona Kew, Alberto D Lopes |
Abstract |
Traditionally, surgery for endometrial cancer (hysterectomy with removal of both fallopian tubes and ovaries) is performed through laparotomy. It has been suggested that the laparoscopic approach is associated with a reduction in operative morbidity. Over the last 10 to 15 years there has been a steady increase of laparoscopy for endometrial cancer. This review investigates the evidence of benefits and harms of laparoscopic surgery compared with laparotomy for presumed early stage endometrial cancer. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 128 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 18% |
Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Other | 28 | 22% |
Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,362,968
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,295
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,084
of 187,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.