You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006672.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vigdis Aasheim, Anne Britt Vika Nilsen, Liv Merete Reinar, Mirjam Lukasse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 41% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 70% |
| Scientists | 9 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 784 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 784 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 122 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 79 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 63 | 8% |
| Researcher | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 6% |
| Other | 119 | 15% |
| Unknown | 299 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 193 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 183 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 2% |
| Psychology | 10 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 57 | 7% |
| Unknown | 316 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#355,815
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#599
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,428
of 332,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.