↓ Skip to main content

Saline nasal irrigation for acute upper respiratory tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in this source, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Saline nasal irrigation for acute upper respiratory tract infections
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006821.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kassel, Jessica C, King, David, Spurling, Geoffrey KP

Abstract

Acute upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), including the common cold and rhinosinusitis, are common afflictions that cause discomfort and debilitation, and contribute significantly to workplace absenteeism. Treatment is generally by antipyretic and mucolytic drugs, and often antibiotics, even though most infections are viral. Nasal irrigation with saline is often employed as an adjunct treatment for chronic or allergic sinusitis, but little is known about its effect on acute URTIs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Other 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 20%