You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for erythema nodosum leprosum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006949.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natasja HJ Van Veen, Diana NJ Lockwood, Wim H van Brakel, Jose Ramirez, Jan Hendrik Richardus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 20% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,016,490
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,342
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,739
of 122,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.