You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007007.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taft, Angela, O'Doherty, Lorna, Hegarty, Kelsey, Ramsay, Jean, Davidson, Leslie, Feder, Gene, Angela Taft, Lorna O'Doherty, Kelsey Hegarty, Jean Ramsay, Leslie Davidson, Gene Feder |
| Abstract |
Intimate partner violence (IPV) damages individuals, their children, communities, and the wider economic and social fabric of society. Some governments and professional organisations recommend screening all women for intimate partner violence rather than asking only women with symptoms (case-finding); however, what is the evidence that screening interventions will increase identification, and referral to support agencies, or improve women's subsequent wellbeing and not cause harm? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 25% |
| Ireland | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Researcher | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 21% |
| Unknown | 55 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 17% |
| Psychology | 34 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,973,967
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,243
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,915
of 204,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.